VISHVA SHAKTI PARTY: MAIN AGENDA ## By Prasoon Kumar Mishra, Founder & ...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DOCTORS MUST KNOW THESE LAWS FOR THEIR PROFESSION

There are so many laws and rules and regulation for doctors. But the doctors starting his profession in India must know following laws related to their profession. 1. Consumer Protection Act 2. The Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and 3. The Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2000 The first law is Consumer Protection Act, as the doctors services are covered under this Act and they are liable for any sort of negligence and deficiency in their service and therefore liable for damage and compensation for their act. Therefore they must know about this act and should be very cautious at the time of treatment to their patients. Some time a fake case is also filed against doctor in greed of money, so he must be very vigilant and be ready to counter the fake his with their medico legal scientific evidence. Pre-conception or Pre-natal Sex determination is an offence in India as per The Pre-natal D...
Read more

L.C.Goyal vs. Nawal Kishore (1997) 11 SCC 258.

                                Date of Judgement: 09.01.1997.                 (Issue of Bogus Cash Receipt by A.O.R. to the Client (Court-fee)                                                        ORDER   This appeal filed under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is directed against the Order of Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India dated 24.6.1983 whereby  the appellant has been suspended from practice for a period of six months.   1.   FACT OF THE CASE:-          The  appellant  was practicing as  an   Advocate-an-Record in this Court.  He  was engaged by one Nawal Kishore (the complainant )  to fil...
Read more

RD Saxena Vs Balram Prasad (AIR 2000 SC 2912)

(Whether the advocate can have a lien on the litigation papers entrusted to him by his clients for pending fees?) FACT OF THE CASE:- The appellant was appointed as a legal advisor to the  Madhya Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd.  (herein referred to as  ‘Bank’ ) in 1990. He used to conduct cases on behalf of the said bank. Subsequently, on 17.7.1993 the bank terminated the retainers of the appellant; and requested him to return his files related to the bank. Instead of returning the files, he informed the bank that only after dues amounting to rupees 97,100/- were paid will he return the files. Hence, the Bank filed a complaint before the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh on 3.2.1994. BAR COUNCIL OF MADHYA PRADESH:-   wherein the appellant contended that he has a right of lien on those files; whereas the respondent contended that the appellant is guilty of professional misconduct by not returning the files to his client. Subsequently, the matter got transf...
Read more