May I introduce myself as a lawyer of "Supreme court India"

and also an international lawyer, Patron & President of

"Global Right & Justice Welfare Society" and founder

President of VSP (Vishva Shakti Party).

www.vishvashaktiparty.org


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

DOCTORS MUST KNOW THESE LAWS FOR THEIR PROFESSION

There are so many laws and rules and regulation for doctors. But the doctors starting his profession in India must know following laws related to their profession. 1. Consumer Protection Act 2. The Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 and 3. The Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette and Ethics) Regulations 2000 The first law is Consumer Protection Act, as the doctors services are covered under this Act and they are liable for any sort of negligence and deficiency in their service and therefore liable for damage and compensation for their act. Therefore they must know about this act and should be very cautious at the time of treatment to their patients. Some time a fake case is also filed against doctor in greed of money, so he must be very vigilant and be ready to counter the fake his with their medico legal scientific evidence. Pre-conception or Pre-natal Sex determination is an offence in India as per The Pre-natal D...
Read more

RD Saxena Vs Balram Prasad (AIR 2000 SC 2912)

(Whether the advocate can have a lien on the litigation papers entrusted to him by his clients for pending fees?) FACT OF THE CASE:- The appellant was appointed as a legal advisor to the  Madhya Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd.  (herein referred to as  ‘Bank’ ) in 1990. He used to conduct cases on behalf of the said bank. Subsequently, on 17.7.1993 the bank terminated the retainers of the appellant; and requested him to return his files related to the bank. Instead of returning the files, he informed the bank that only after dues amounting to rupees 97,100/- were paid will he return the files. Hence, the Bank filed a complaint before the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh on 3.2.1994. BAR COUNCIL OF MADHYA PRADESH:-   wherein the appellant contended that he has a right of lien on those files; whereas the respondent contended that the appellant is guilty of professional misconduct by not returning the files to his client. Subsequently, the matter got transf...
Read more

T.C.Mathai & Anr. Vs. The District & Sessions Judge, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala (1999) 3SCC 614. Date of Judgement: 31.03.1999.

                        FACTS OF THE CASE: The appellant claims to be the power-of-attorney holder of a couple (husband and wife) living in Kuwait.   He sought permission of the Sessions Court, Trivandrum to appear and plead on behalf of the said couple who are arrayed as respondents in a criminal revision petition filed before the said Sessions.    Session Court:- Permission was declined, as the request for such permission did not emanate from the respondent-couple themselves. There upon appellant moved the High Court of   Kerala under Article 226 of the Constitution for issuance of a direction to the Sessions Judge concerned to grant the permission sought for.   Single Judge of the High Court:- dismissed the Original Petition against which appellant filed a writ appeal.   Division Bench of the High Co...
Read more